Tuesday, April 14, 2015
Wednesday, April 1, 2015
Wednesday, March 25, 2015
Monday, March 23, 2015
Wednesday, March 11, 2015
Sunday, March 8, 2015
Tuesday, February 3, 2015
Friday, January 23, 2015
I found this September 2001 magazine in a keepsakes box the other day. Based on what happened in Paris at Charlie Hebdo (a challenge to our culture of free speech) it appears that we have learned nothing from 9/11. More accurately stated, the huge progressive brains that dominated the response to 9/11 STILL know nothing about Islam. The radicals were challenging our culture on 9/11 and they still are.
In 2001 progressives said we should not blame so called moderate muslims for 9/11, yet these same moderates have done virtually nothing since to help us stem the evil tide that is radical Islam.
Thank you, bleeding hearts of the world, for thwarting efforts to protect ourselves from those who want to kill us.
Friday, January 16, 2015
George Friedman - Stratfor Publisher and editor, says (as I feel) that the problem with Islam is the sheer numbers. Even though most Muslims aren't jihadists, enough are to hurt us.
"But while the Europeans have particular issues with Islam, and have had them for more than 1,000 years, there is a more generalizable problem. Christianity has been sapped of its evangelical zeal and no longer uses the sword to kill and convert its enemies. At least parts of Islam retain that zeal. And saying that not all Muslims share this vision does not solve the problem. Enough Muslims share that fervency to [kill and] endanger the lives of those they despise, and this tendency toward violence cannot be tolerated by either their Western targets or by Muslims who refuse to subscribe to a jihadist ideology. And there is no way to distinguish those who might kill from those who won't. The Muslim community might be able to make this distinction, but a 25-year-old European or American policeman cannot. And the Muslims either can't or won't police themselves. Therefore, we are left in a state of war. French Prime Minister Manuel Valls has called this a war on radical Islam. If only they wore uniforms or bore distinctive birthmarks, then fighting only the radical Islamists would not be a problem. But Valls' distinctions notwithstanding, the world can either accept periodic attacks, or see the entire Muslim community as a potential threat until proven otherwise. These are terrible choices, but history is filled with them. Calling for a war on radical Islamists is like calling for war on the followers of Jean-Paul Sartre. Exactly what do they look like?"
"But the idea of shared principles other than their own is offensive to the religious everywhere, and at this moment in history, this aversion is most commonly present among Muslims. This is a truth that must be faced.
"The Mediterranean borderland was a place of conflict well before Christianity and Islam existed. It will remain a place of conflict even if both lose their vigorous love of their own beliefs. It is an illusion to believe that conflicts rooted in geography can be abolished. It is also a mistake to be so philosophical as to disengage from the human fear of being killed at your desk for your ideas. We are entering a place that has no solutions. Such a place does have decisions, and all of the choices will be bad. What has to be done will be done, and those who refused to make choices will see themselves as more moral than those who did. There is a war, and like all wars, this one is very different from the last in the way it is prosecuted. But it is war nonetheless, and denying that is denying the obvious."
Read more: A War Between Two Worlds | Stratfor