Just as there is leftist bullying in the media as explained by Ben Shapiro, it exists in government bureaucracies too. The IRS being caught red-handed targeting conservatives groups is the latest example. It's also alarming, to think that conservative thought would be attacked by a supposedly neutral bureaucracy. No one apparently told anyone to do it, but it got done.
If honest, middle of the road liberals don't stand up and denounce this failure (and probable crime), they are guilty of disowning the concept of democracy itself. Guilty, as well, of an unbelievable level of stupidity.
I've said it before, non-wealth producers (liberals) cannot be trusted with political power. They invariably use it to accustom more and more people to the idea of riding on other people's backs as government employees. They are the moochers, and they've figured out how to control government without producing any wealth themselves.
With the IRS scandal, it's almost as though the moochers (liberals) have told themselves that "since we've conquered politics, why not use the tax department to suppress dissent?"
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Sunday, March 31, 2013
Bullies: How the Left Silences Opposition
Ben Shapiro has a new book out discussing the bully tactics of the left, which is to essentially paint the right as awful people without value. As he also says it only works with the complicity of the media which pretends to be neutral but acts to reinforce the "conservative don't care" message.
This problem is compounded by the fact that the average voter has only the most fleeting familiarity with the facts. They instead prefer to consume the slanted pablum the media offers.
"
The left’s favorite bully tactic is painting its opposition as morally deficient and unworthy of being part of the conversation. The left uses this tactic on virtually every topic. Sequestration? It turns out that those dastardly right-wingers just want to hurt first responders and teachers. Gun control? Those conservatives just don’t care about dead kids. Gay marriage? Conservatives hate homosexuals. Once you paint your opposition as morally bankrupt, you don’t have to win the debate. You win by default. That’s the basis of the political correctness movement.
"
***
"
But the left couldn’t get away with any of this without the media. The media are the greatest of all the leftist bullies, because they play at objectivity while sliding the knife in as deep as humanly possible. By lying to the American people about their disinterested reportage, they are able to convince Americans that people of good heart cannot take conservatives seriously. That’s a damaging message.
"
Monday, March 25, 2013
Tuesday, March 19, 2013
We Got Stronger Beer
Clever ditty by Tim Hicks comparing Americans' & Canadians' beers, language etc. Watch for the fake beer label at 1:15 lol
Tuesday, February 5, 2013
Malala Yousefzai
This incredibly brave 15 year old is not only standing up to the most savage and abhorrent example of humanity yet, the Taliban. She is also teaching the weak-kneed Western Left what "human rights" really means, and it isn't flatulent, pompous UN autocrats continually criticizing western societies.
Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Islam's Rise and the West's Denial
November 20, 2012
William Kilpatrick on what the spread of militant Islam means for the future of the West.
William Kilpatrick is an author and lecturer who taught for many years at Boston College and whose articles on Islam have appeared in numerous publications, including Investor's Business Daily, FrontPage Magazine, the National Catholic Register, and World magazine. He has written several books, including Psychological Seduction and Why Johnny Can't Tell Right from Wrong, and his most recent book, Christianity, Islam and Atheism: The Struggle for the Soul of the West, will be released next week from Ignatius Press. Kilpatrick recently spoke with Catholic World Report about Islam and its growing significance for the West.
CWR: You begin by noting that, yes, there is some common ground between Christianity and Islam, but the differences are far more important. What are the most important differences between the two religions?
William Kilpatrick: Beneath the surface similarities lie important and largely irreconcilable differences. Islam rejects the Trinity, the Incarnation, the Crucifixion, and the Resurrection. In fact, associating partners with Allah—as Christians do—is considered the very worst sin. Chapter nine, verse 30 of the Koran says, “the Christians call Christ the son of Allah…Allah’s curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the truth.”
******
The two faiths also differ sharply in their vision of paradise. Heaven for Christians means union with God and the fellowship of the saints. For Muslims heaven means union with 72 “high-bosomed” and eternally youthful virgins. That’s for males, of course; the Koran is unclear about what sort of heaven women will enjoy. These differing views of paradise have very serious practical implications in the here and now. The Islamic version of paradise creates quite an incentive for young men to try to get there as quickly as possible. And, according to Islamic tradition, the only sure route is by “killing and being killed in the cause of Allah.” Take Mohamed Atta. Due to an airline mistake his luggage was left behind in Boston on the day of the 9/11 flight. When authorities later opened it they found a wedding suit, a bottle of cologne, and a letter expressing his anticipation of marriage to his 72 heavenly wives. As Richard Weaver wrote, “ideas have consequences.”
*********
Kilpatrick: One thing that the West doesn’t grasp is that Islam is a political religion with political ambitions. Omar Ahmad, the co-founder of the Council on American Islamic Relations, has said that “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith but to be dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.” Numerous Islamic authorities have expressed similar sentiments. The supposedly moderate Imam Feisal Rauf, the initiator of the Ground Zero mosque project, wrote an article for the Huffington Post containing the observation, “What Muslims want is a judiciary (in the US) that ensures that the laws are not in conflict with the Qur`an and the Hadith.” What he means is that US law must be brought in line with Islamic sharia law. Since very many provisions of sharia law are considered criminal under US law, that would mean the overthrow of much of our legal code.
************
According to a popular Muslim poem:
The mosques are our barracks,
the domes our helmets
the minarets our bayonets
And the faithful our soldiers
Many Muslims think of Islam not only as a religion but also as an army—an army with a mission of subjugation. That’s why the penalty for apostasy is death. Just as a deserter from an army in time of war may be punished with the death penalty, so also a deserter from the army of Islam.
*********
If America is eventually subjugated, however, it won’t be the result of armed jihad, but of cultural jihad—the steady incremental advance of sharia law through agitation, propaganda, lawfare, political activism, and infiltration of key governmental and educational institutions. Many Muslim leaders have made it plain that they plan to subjugate America under Islam. We should take them seriously.
Labels:
Christianity,
Islam,
Jihad,
Muslims
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Saturday, October 27, 2012
Friday, October 26, 2012
The Piranha Brothers
I saw this article in the Toronto Sun about a British gangster, Charlie Richardson, who'd just died at the age of 78.
It says that in the 1960's, Richardson, a scrap metal dealer, was also the Torture Gang boss. The story cites ways he punished those who crossed him; one technique Charlie used to enforce his will was to nail people to the floor. His rivals were twin gangster brothers Ronnie and Reggie Kray.
After reading the story I figured that Charlie, Ronnie, and Reggie were collectively the inspiration for The Python's sketch about brutal gangster twins, the Piranha Brothers.
I'm guessing they mixed up the characters to avoid legal action AND personal injury
. They were probably too scared to even mention "taking a shirt from Charlie".
I love the irony in Charlie/Dinsdale's profession of innocence at the end of the article.
* * * *
Here's an excerpt from the actual script of Monty Python's episode 14, The Piranha Brothers (with added photos):
Colour code: John Cleese - Michael Palin - Eric Idle - Graham Chapman - Terry Jones - Terry Gilliam - Carol Cleveland

It says that in the 1960's, Richardson, a scrap metal dealer, was also the Torture Gang boss. The story cites ways he punished those who crossed him; one technique Charlie used to enforce his will was to nail people to the floor. His rivals were twin gangster brothers Ronnie and Reggie Kray.
After reading the story I figured that Charlie, Ronnie, and Reggie were collectively the inspiration for The Python's sketch about brutal gangster twins, the Piranha Brothers.
I'm guessing they mixed up the characters to avoid legal action AND personal injury
I love the irony in Charlie/Dinsdale's profession of innocence at the end of the article.
* * * *
Here's an excerpt from the actual script of Monty Python's episode 14, The Piranha Brothers (with added photos):
Episode Fourteen
Colour code: John Cleese - Michael Palin - Eric Idle - Graham Chapman - Terry Jones - Terry Gilliam - Carol Cleveland
|

The episode ends with Luigi Vercotti and his high class escort agency (the Chinese watch
"What did Doug do?"
" He used ... sarcasm."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evj24bXakqg&feature=relmfu)
Dinsdale's imaginary nemesis Spiny Norman, a giant hedgehog.

* * * *
Link to the full TV episode above is here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zaoyhlUPWA&feature=related
Scripts of all Python episodes:
http://www.ibras.dk/montypython/justthewords.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















